Supreme Court of Minnesota· 5/9/1958
Naftalin v. King
Citations
- 252 Minn. 381
- 90 N.W.2d 185
- 1958 Minn. LEXIS 622
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- indebtedness not considered unconstitutional if payable only from a special fund, the proceeds of which are derived from a levy and tax collection authorized for that specific purpose
- indebtedness not considered unconstitutional if payable only from a special fund, the proceeds of which are derived from a levy and tax collection authorized for that specific purpose
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Matson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
8 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Christensen v. Minneapolis Municipal Employees Retirement BoardSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1983-03-18· cited 67×
- Minneapolis Gas Co. v. ZimmermanSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1958-07-11· cited 56×
- State Ex Rel. Toll Bridge Auth. v. YelleWashington Supreme Court· 1962-12-13· cited 49×
- Winkler v. State School Building AuthorityWest Virginia Supreme Court· 1993-07-22· cited 42×
- Schowalter v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2012-10-31· cited 24×
- Naftalin v. KingSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1960-04-01· cited 16×
- Davies v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1982-02-19· cited 13×
- Christensen v. Mpls. Mun. Emp. Retire. Bd.Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1983-03-18· cited 5×
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- McGahey v. VirginiaSupreme Court· 1890-05-19· cited 121×
- City of Galena v. AmySupreme Court· 1867-02-26· cited 80×
- Visina v. FreemanSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1958-04-11· cited 61×
- State ex rel. Hahn v. YoungSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1881-09-09· cited 48×
- State ex rel. Smith v. Van ReedSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1914-03-13· cited 26×
- Fleckten v. LambertonSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1897-07-01· cited 24×
- In re GemmillIdaho Supreme Court· 1911-12-08· cited 16×
- Brown v. RingdalSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1909-07-23· cited 11×
- Village of Kent v. United States ex rel. DanaSixth Circuit· 1902-01-07· cited 11×
- First National Bank v. Village of BuhlSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1922-01-20· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.