Naef v. Masonite Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the plaintiffs’ amended complaint contained a cause of action alleging “a breach of implied warranty of merchantability”
• addressing the defendant’s argument that the plaintiffs cannot bring a cause of action for breach of an implied warranty of merchantability and rejecting that argument based on Chandler
• “{T]he Court must determine at what point Defendants could have intelligently ascertained that the action was removable through reasonable scrutiny of the pleadings and facts of the action as it developed in state court.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).