Nadler v. Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that “[i]n Joy Technologies, public policy played a part in our rejection of Pennsylvania law as controlling the meaning of an exclusionary clause in a commercial liability policy issued in Pennsylvania to a Pennsylvania corporation”
• stating “[i]n Joy Technologies, ... the public policy issue did not arise from the conflict between the substantive law of Pennsylvania and West Virginia, but rather from the wrongdoing of the insurer”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).