Nadim Hanna v. Eric Holder, Jr.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that testimony of a petitioner and her father that the petitioner was granted “landed immigrant status” in Canada was enough for the Government to satisfy its prima facie case
• recognizing ineffective assistance as a basis for relieving an alien of counsel’s admissions
• \The immigration courts should have the opportunity to review the record and determine [whether Hanna's underlying offense is a CIMT].\
• “as a threshold matter” the alien must argue “that the factual admissions or concessions of removability are untrue or incorrect,” and that they came from unreasonable professional judgment or produced an unjust result

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).