Nader v. Baroody

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that FACA did not “apply to all 15 amorphous, ad hoc group meetings”
• suggesting that a group might violate FACA if “the lack of formal organization arises out of a purpose to evade the statute”
• FACA does not apply to casual, day-to- day meetings by which the President gathers information and views

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).