· 1/21/1999
Nadel v. Play by Play Toys & Novelties, Inc.
Citations
- 34 F. Supp. 2d 180
- 50 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1288
- 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 476
- 1999 WL 25752
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- dismissing contract claim only on ground that Nadel’s idea lacked general novelty and thus would not suffice as consideration
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Stein
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.