Nacey v. Board of Massage Therapists

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• discussing “certain procedural rights [that] govern a person’s pursuit of VA benefits” and citing, inter alia, Thurber, supra, and Austin, infra, but not discussing U.S. Constitution
• reviewing the Board's determination that the veteran's NOD was untimely
• \This Court has been wary of action or inaction by the B[oard] that would have had the effect of depriving this Court of jurisdiction to review a B[oard] decision over which the Court would have had jurisdiction but for the B[oard]'s action or inaction.\
• “This Court has been wary of action or inaction by the B[oard] that would have had the effect of depriving this Court of jurisdiction to review a B[oard] decision over which the Court would have had jurisdiction but for the B[oard]’s action or inaction.”
• \[T]he Court has jurisdiction to assess its own jurisdiction.\
• “an untimely NOD deprives [BVA] of jurisdiction”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).