Skip to main content
· 3/8/1996

Nabors v. Transouth Financial Corp.

Citations

  • 928 F. Supp. 1085
  • 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8671
  • 1996 WL 341477

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that Big B did not “directly address[] the issue before the court because [the] case involved a negligent supervision claim brought solely against an employer rather than against both the employer and the employer’s supervisor-employee” (emphasis in original)
  • explaining that Big B did not “directly address[] the issue before the court because [the] case involved a negligent supervision claim brought solely against an employer rather than against both the employer and the employer’s supervisor-employee” (emphasis in original)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: De Ment

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.