Skip to main content
· 2/3/1999

Nabisco, Inc. v. PF Brands, Inc.

Citations

  • 50 F. Supp. 2d 188
  • 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 922
  • 1999 WL 47313

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • \The 'distinctiveness' of the mark . . . is essentially synonymous for fame and not a term of art.\
  • “The ‘distinctiveness’ of the mark ... is essentially synonymous for fame and not a term of art.”
  • “The Goldfish shape, the most salient feature of the product design, dominates these advertisements.”
  • “The print advertisements call attention to the product configuration, prominently displaying the Goldfish form.”
  • finding the Pepperidge Farm Goldfish to constitute a strong mark
  • to be reported at 50 F. Supp. 2d 188

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Scheindlin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.