· 1/6/2000
N803RA, INC. v. Hammer
Citations
- 11 S.W.3d 363
- 2000 Tex. App. LEXIS 131
- 2000 WL 5056
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that pro se plaintiff’s letter to court was both special appearance and original answer and did not waive special appearance
- dismissing case after sustaining Florida defendant’s special appearance raised in letter to district clerk 8 seeking “dismissal”
- likewise following Lippmann in context of waiver of special appearance
- likewise following Lippmann in context of waiver of special appearance
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Eric Andell
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.