Skip to main content
· 1/6/2000

N803RA, INC. v. Hammer

Citations

  • 11 S.W.3d 363
  • 2000 Tex. App. LEXIS 131
  • 2000 WL 5056

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that pro se plaintiff’s letter to court was both special appearance and original answer and did not waive special appearance
  • dismissing case after sustaining Florida defendant’s special appearance raised in letter to district clerk 8 seeking “dismissal”
  • likewise following Lippmann in context of waiver of special appearance
  • likewise following Lippmann in context of waiver of special appearance

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Eric Andell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.