N v. Akzo, Aramide Maatschappij V.O.F., Appellant/cross-Appellee v. E.I. Dupont De Nemours, Appellee/cross-Appellant

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• simple negligence or an error in judgment is never sufficient for a holding of inequitable conduct
• although material misrepresentation was made to the PTO, patentee was not guilty of inequitable conduct where no showing was made of intent or gross negligence on the part of patentee

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).