Skip to main content
· 10/30/1963

N. M. Paterson & Sons, Ltd. v. City of Chicago

Citations

  • 324 F.2d 254
  • 1963 A.M.C. 2471

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating “[w]hether an insured has substantially complied with the provisions of an insurance policy is a question of fact precluding summary judgment”
  • stating “[w]hether an insured has substantially complied with the provisions of an insurance policy is a question of fact precluding summary judgment”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Castle

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.