Myslimi v. Biden

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the judge is not to make this decision based upon the existence of an earlier order, or evidence at a previous hearing, but to make a determination on the basis of the current situation
• noting negative effect of order on future c. 209A proceedings and bail hearings, as well as criminal jeopardy subjecting defendant to warrantless arrest
• “The mere fact that a c. 209A order issued in the past, standing alone, is not enough for a judge to conclude, on a request for renewal, that ‘additional time [is] reasonably necessary to protect the plaintiff.’ G. L. c. 209A, § 3”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).