Skip to main content
· 6/22/1999

Myrtice Schoemakers,petitioner v. Office of Personnel Management

Citations

  • 180 F.3d 1377
  • 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 13702
  • 1999 WL 415394

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that “[n]either courts nor administrative agencies . . . have the authority to waive requirements (including filing deadlines) that Congress has imposed as a condition to the payment of [F]ederal money”
  • rejecting a conditional affidavit that merely established that petitioner’s wife did not receive the required annual notice and not that her husband, the annuitant, did not receive it

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Plager, Friedman, Lourie

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.