Seventh Circuit· 6/5/2015

Myron Mintz v. Caterpillar Inc.

Citations

788 F.3d 673
91 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1849
2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 9422
99 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 45,334
127 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 317
2015 WL 3529396

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that a plaintiff could not show he was meeting employer’s legitimate expectations while also admitting that he was not meeting his production goals
concluding that a motion to vacate an order granting summary judgment was not a Rule 60(b) motion since it was made before entry of final judgment
concluding that a motion to vacate an order granting summary judgment was not a Rule 60(b) motion since it was made before entry of final judgment
noting that whether a performance standard imposed “was a realistic expectation is not for us to decide”
holding nine months between complaint and adverse action \suggests no connection\
finding that Rule 60 was inapplicable prior to final judgment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wood, Williams, Tinder

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.