Myrna Ochoa-Carrillo v. Alberto Gonzales, Attorney General of the United States of America

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that appellate review of a reinstatement order is limited to the certified administrative record
• validating as consistent with section 241(a)(5) of the Act the regulation permitting reinstatement of a prior order of removal through a DHS officer, without a hearing before an Immigration Judge
• to succeed on due process claim, petitioner must “prove that he was actually prejudiced by the lack of process afforded to him”
• petitioner suffered no prejudice when she did not make a statement to DHS, request additional process by DHS, or submit anything in the nature of an offer of proof to DHS that would demonstrate she would prevail
• discussing the finger- print requirement
• discussing the finger- print requirement

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).