Myrna Gregoria Ochoa-Carrillo v. Alberto Gonzales, Attorney General of the United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that “the limited habeas review of (removal orders issued under § 1225(b)(1) that is authorized by § 1252(e)(2) may not be conducted in a § 1231(a)(5) reinstatement proceeding”). Petitioner’s 1998 removal order was issued pursuant to § 1225(b)(1
• “[J]udicial review in the appropriate court of appeals is the ‘sole and exclusive’ means to review a § 1231(a)(5) order reinstating a prior removal order.”
• “[J]udicial review in the appropriate court of appeals is the sole and exclusive means to review a § 1231(a)(5) order reinstating a prior removal order[.]” (internal quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).