Myrland v. Myrland

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that husband’s employment by wife’s businesses, both before and during the marriage, did not change the character of wife’s businesses from separate to community
• holding wife’s deposit of her separate business monies into a jointly held bank account did not constitute a gift to the community
• fundamental requisites of a partnership were “intention, co-ownership of the business, community of interest, and community of power in administration.”
• husband performed services for his wife's business, one of the assets of which was the wife's separately owned real property; held, husband's performance of services did not change the character of the real property to community property
• separate property put into joint tenancy

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).