Myrdal v. District of Columbia

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• locating proffered expert’s testimony about what contributed to slip and fall at the intersection of human factors and engineering
• “[t]he Court finds that while [the expert] holds degrees in mechanical engineering, as opposed to in human factors, he is qualified to offer opinions on such matters.”
• “Since a reasonable jury could conclude that Wal–Mart knew that the sidewalk had not been cleared and yet told Mr. Garrity to walk to the front of the store, summary judgment is not appropriate.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).