· 11/18/2013
Mynes v. United States
Citations
- 134 S. Ct. 670
- 187 L. Ed. 2d 415
- 82 U.S.L.W. 3298
- 571 U.S. 1021
- 2013 WL 6050175
- 2013 U.S. LEXIS 8177
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- collecting cases in which the Wisconsin courts have employed a substance-over-form analysis in “a variety of contexts, most notably including tax cases”
- finding shareholders liable for tax and penalties where “the [entire] transaction was premised on the assumption that the taxes would not be paid”
- collecting cases supporting the proposition that “[e]very circuit that has addressed [the] question has ... required independent determinations of transferee status under federal law and substantive liability under state law”
- explaining, in the context of a tax dispute applying the substance-over-form theory in tax law, how the economic reality of a complete asset sale can be equivalent to a stock sale
- affirming the Tax Court's finding that a loan to purchase the shares of the target corporation was a sham in part because \the loan was entirely undocumented; there was no promissory note or writing setting forth the terms of the loan\
- dis- regarding one part of a transaction because it lacked eco- nomic substance
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.