Skip to main content
· 11/18/2013

Mynes v. United States

Citations

  • 134 S. Ct. 670
  • 187 L. Ed. 2d 415
  • 82 U.S.L.W. 3298
  • 571 U.S. 1021
  • 2013 WL 6050175
  • 2013 U.S. LEXIS 8177

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • collecting cases in which the Wisconsin courts have employed a substance-over-form analysis in “a variety of contexts, most notably including tax cases”
  • finding shareholders liable for tax and penalties where “the [entire] transaction was premised on the assumption that the taxes would not be paid”
  • collecting cases supporting the proposition that “[e]very circuit that has addressed [the] question has ... required independent determinations of transferee status under federal law and substantive liability under state law”
  • explaining, in the context of a tax dispute applying the substance-over-form theory in tax law, how the economic reality of a complete asset sale can be equivalent to a stock sale
  • affirming the Tax Court's finding that a loan to purchase the shares of the target corporation was a sham in part because \the loan was entirely undocumented; there was no promissory note or writing setting forth the terms of the loan\
  • dis- regarding one part of a transaction because it lacked eco- nomic substance

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.