Mygatt v. M. Schauffer-Flaum Co.
Citations
- 191 F. 836
- 112 C.C.A. 350
- 1911 U.S. App. LEXIS 5008
Syllabus
<p>1. Patents (§ 328*) — Invention—Design for Lamp Reflector.</p> <p>The Mygatt design patent, No. 37,983, for a design for a prismatic reflector for electric lights, is void for lack of invention, in view of design patent No. 37,967 to the same patentee.</p> <p>■ 2.' Patents (§ 28*) — Invention—Designs.</p> <p>To sustain a patent, whether for a mechanical construction or a design, it must appear that there was an exercise of the inventive faculties; and a mere change in construction, which shows no originality and adds no beauty to existing structures, is not sufficient to sustain a patent for a design.</p> <p>[Ed. Note. — For other cases, see Patents, Cent. Dig. § 33; Dee. Dig. § 28.*]</p>
Judges: Coxe
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.