Skip to main content

Myers v. State

Citations

  • 462 S.W.2d 265
  • 3 Tenn. Crim. App. 414
  • 1970 Tenn. Crim. App. LEXIS 463

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a petitioner may not relitigate questions previously determined adversely to him in two separate habeas corpus cases by courts of competent jurisdiction
  • holding that habeas corpus proceedings may not be employed to question, review, or test sufficiency of the evidence
  • stating that post-conviction proceedings may not be used to challenge the sufficiency of the evidence at trial
  • stating that appellant could not relitigate questions previously determined adversely to him in two separate habeas corpus cases by state and federal courts of competent jurisdiction
  • “Habeas corpus and post-conviction proceedings may not be employed to question or review or test the sufficiency of the evidence . . . .”
  • “Habeas corpus and post-conviction proceedings may not be employed to question or review or test the sufficiency of the evidence at the original trial.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Oliver, Dwyer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

39 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

29 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.