Myers v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that DUI is a general intent crime because “[t]he state does not have to prove that the defendant intended to drive under the influence, only that the defendant was in an intoxicated condition and that she intended to drive.”
• “driving under the influence ... [is a] crime[ ] malum prohibitum, the criminal intent element of which is simply the intent to do the act which results in the violation of the law, not the intent to commit the crime itself”
• “driving under the influence . . . [is a] crime[] malum prohibitum, the criminal intent element of which is simply the intent to do the act which results in the violation of the law, not the intent to commit the crime itself.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Jones v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2014-03-28· cited 26×
• Kirkland v. the State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2015-10-06· cited 21×
• Michael W. Jones v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2014-03-28
• Norvee-Arthur Daniel Wright v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2022-09-06

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Dix v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2000-10-11· cited 14×
• Crossley v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2003-05-13· cited 13×
• Colon v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2002-07-12· cited 11×
• Larsen v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2001-12-06· cited 7×
• Lewis v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2004-08-11· cited 5×