· 5/2/2000
Myers v. Robert Lewis Seigle, PC
Citations
- 751 A.2d 1182
- 2000 Pa. Super. 136
- 2000 Pa. Super. LEXIS 629
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- appellant required to prove actual loss due to attorney’s breach of duty of care
- summary judgment in favor of lawyers appropriate where legal malpractice plaintiff could not establish actual loss or identify design or manufacturing defect due to lawyers’ disposal of vehicle involved in accident
- summary judgment in favor of lawyers appropriate where legal malpractice plaintiff could not establish actual loss or identify design or manufacturing defect due to lawyers’ disposal of vehicle involved in accident
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: McEwen, Joyce, Tamilia
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.