Skip to main content
· 5/2/2000

Myers v. Robert Lewis Seigle, PC

Citations

  • 751 A.2d 1182
  • 2000 Pa. Super. 136
  • 2000 Pa. Super. LEXIS 629

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • appellant required to prove actual loss due to attorney’s breach of duty of care
  • summary judgment in favor of lawyers appropriate where legal malpractice plaintiff could not establish actual loss or identify design or manufacturing defect due to lawyers’ disposal of vehicle involved in accident
  • summary judgment in favor of lawyers appropriate where legal malpractice plaintiff could not establish actual loss or identify design or manufacturing defect due to lawyers’ disposal of vehicle involved in accident

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McEwen, Joyce, Tamilia

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.