Myers v. Ragen

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that equitable considerations mandated issuance of permit contrary to intervening amendment of ordinance even though no finding of bad faith or vested rights
• holding that it would be inequitable to allow a town to deny a permit based on a new ordinance after the property owner was denied a permit three times and brought suit to determine the validity of the prior ordinance
• zoning ordinance could not be changed to adversely affect Humble Oil \more than a year after Humble's first petition for a permit and one month after Humble had started these court proceedings based on the ordinance in effect\ at the time
• zoning ordinance could not be changed to adversely affect Humble Oil \more than a year after Humble's first petition for a permit and one month after Humble had started these court proceedings based on the ordinance in effect\ at the time
• ordinance that gives power to board to deny permit for gas station without adequate standards is unconstitutional
• ordinance that gives power to board to deny permit for gas station without adequate standards .is unconstitutional

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).