Myers v. Olson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• divorcing parties had every reason to expect that stipulated final decree would finally resolve all property issues concerning the property items covered by the decree
• applying res judicata where husband had the advice of counsel and the opportunity to raise any issue concerning the division of property before he entered into the stipulated final divorce decree
• claim ordinarily precluded by res judicata when there has been full, fair opportunity to litigate all issues arising from claim
• \Res judicata will ordinarily preclude a claim where there has been a full and fair opportunity to litigate all issues arising out of that claim.\
• “Res judicata will ordinarily preclude a claim where there has been a full and fair opportunity to litigate all issues arising out of that claim.”
• “Properly authorized and acknowledged consent judgments and judgments rendered on stipulations are conclusive of all claims determined therein and may not be collaterally attacked by the parties thereto.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).