Fifth Circuit· 2/21/1996
Myers v. Johnson
Citations
- 76 F.3d 1330
- 1996 WL 75728
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that a defendant who accepts the assistance of counsel on appeal has no constitutional right to hybrid representation and cannot expect to be allowed to file a supplemental pro se brief
- “By accepting the assistance of counsel the criminal appellant waives his right to present pro se briefs on direct appeal.”
- “By accepting the assistance of counsel the criminal appellant waives his right to present pro se briefs on direct appeal”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: King, Demoss, Stewart
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
27 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- United States v. DavisFifth Circuit· 2001-11-07· cited 70×
- Robert Grady Johnson v. Ron ChampionTenth Circuit· 2002-04-26· cited 60×
- United States v. DavisFifth Circuit· 2002-03-11· cited 54×
- United States v. Anthony Alozie OgbonnaFifth Circuit· 1999-08-05· cited 53×
- Garcia v. QuartermanFifth Circuit· 2006-06-23· cited 50×
- Marshall Batchelor v. Burl Cain, WardenFifth Circuit· 2012-05-29· cited 39×
- Propes v. QuartermanFifth Circuit· 2009-06-26· cited 37×
- People v. ScottCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1998-06-05· cited 31×
- State v. DavenportSupreme Court of New Jersey· 2003-07-30· cited 22×
- Dyer v. JohnsonFifth Circuit· 1997-03-18· cited 14×
- United States v. David RodriguezFifth Circuit· 2016-05-04· cited 14×
- Trest v. WhitleyFifth Circuit· 1996-09-17· cited 14×
- State v. SimmsCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2009-08-24· cited 12×
- United States v. Teresa MillerFourth Circuit· 2022-11-29· cited 10×
- Martinez v. DretkeW.D. Texas· 2006-03-29· cited 8×
- Bostick v. QuartermanFifth Circuit· 2009-08-21· cited 6×
- Mitchell v. SenkowskiN.D. New York· 2006-04-24· cited 6×
- Fuentez v. StateTex. App. Ct., 11th Dist. (Eastland)· 2006-06-08· cited 5×
- Yowell v. ThalerFifth Circuit· 2011-09-12· cited 1×
- Rose v. JohnsonS.D. Texas· 2001-03-26· cited 1×
Cites
30 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1967-03-27· cited 23,069×
- Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court· 1985-03-19· cited 11,658×
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1975-06-30· cited 11,585×
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court· 1948-03-08· cited 9,383×
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court· 1963-03-18· cited 8,419×
- Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court· 1986-04-07· cited 7,102×
- Brecht v. AbrahamsonSupreme Court· 1993-06-07· cited 7,022×
- Teague v. LaneSupreme Court· 1989-04-17· cited 6,602×
- Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court· 1991-05-20· cited 6,060×
- Douglas v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1963-04-29· cited 3,330×
- Evitts v. LuceySupreme Court· 1985-03-18· cited 3,068×
- Tumey v. OhioSupreme Court· 1927-03-14· cited 2,714×
- Rose v. ClarkSupreme Court· 1986-07-02· cited 2,431×
- McKaskle v. WigginsSupreme Court· 1984-01-23· cited 2,288×
- Coleman v. AlabamaSupreme Court· 1970-06-22· cited 1,808×
- Vasquez v. HillerySupreme Court· 1986-01-14· cited 1,638×
- Price v. JohnstonSupreme Court· 1948-05-24· cited 1,320×
- Hopper v. EvansSupreme Court· 1982-05-24· cited 715×
- Webb v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1976-02-25· cited 405×
- Don Garriga Chapman v. United StatesFifth Circuit· 1977-06-08· cited 191×
Other cases named Myers v. Johnson
7 other CourtListener records share this case name.
- Myers v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1966-04-20· cited 12×
- Myers v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1967-06-20· cited 3×
- Myers v. JohnsonCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1949-01-25· cited 2×
- Myers v. JohnsonSupreme Court· 1991-04-22
- Myers v. JohnsonSupreme Court· 1991-04-22
- Myers v. JohnsonSupreme Court· 2003-10-06
- Myers v. JohnsonSupreme Court· 2003-10-06
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.