Myers v. Hunter

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting it was “clear from the trial court’s statement exactly what motivated and prompted the sentence”.
• interpreting contract’s use of “in connection with performance” to give meaning 18 to “in connection with” because interpretation of “performance” alone would lead to result different from interpretation that gave meaning to both “in connection with” and “performance”
• safe place statute duties are non-delegable, and \whether the owner or employer is to be made financially whole from another source by principles of law or contract is an entirely different question\
• \[T]he person who has that duty cannot assert that another to whom he has allegedly-delegated the duty is to be substituted as the primary defendant in his stead for a violation of safe place provisions.\
• \[T]he person who has that duty cannot assert that another to whom he has allegedly delegated the duty is to be substituted as the primary defendant in his stead for a violation of safe place provisions.\
• nondele-gable duties imposed by state safe-place statute

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).