Skip to main content
· 1/8/1926

Myers v. Hadfield-Penfield Steel Co.

Citations

  • 10 F.2d 56
  • 1926 U.S. App. LEXIS 2171

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that court, in deciding motion under ORCP 54 B(2), was entitled to resolve conflicts in the plaintiffs evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Donahue, Moorman, Sessions

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.