Myers v. Dunscombe

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming directed verdict where the plaintiff offered no expert opinion that negligently administered dental injection had caused her nerve damage and there was at least one alternative explanation for causation of the plaintiff’s injury
• affirming a directed verdict in favor of the defendant in a dental malpractice action where “there was no evidence on which the jury could do more than speculate that * * * negligence caused plaintiffs injury” (emphasis in original)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).