· 2/21/2006
Myers v. City of Tempe
Citations
- 128 P.3d 751
- 212 Ariz. 128
- 472 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 4
- 2006 Ariz. LEXIS 23
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that no authority imposes a non-delegable duty on a city to provide emergency services
- holding that decision “following] automatically” from immune' policy decision was also immune
- holding that decision \follow[ing] automatically\ from immune policy decision was also immune
- noting that the dispatcher followed a policy the city adopted in an intergovernmental agreement, the latter being,a decision that both parties conceded was absolutely immune
- noting that the dispatcher followed a policy the city adopted in an intergovernmental agreement, the latter being a decision that both parties conceded was absolutely immune
- holding immune under § 12-820.01 an administrative decision that “involved weighing risks and gains, concerned the distribution of assets, and required consulting the city’s subject matter experts”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: McGregor, Berch, Ryan, Hurwitz, Bales
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.