Skip to main content
· 2/21/2006

Myers v. City of Tempe

Citations

  • 128 P.3d 751
  • 212 Ariz. 128
  • 472 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 4
  • 2006 Ariz. LEXIS 23

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that no authority imposes a non-delegable duty on a city to provide emergency services
  • holding that decision “following] automatically” from immune' policy decision was also immune
  • holding that decision \follow[ing] automatically\ from immune policy decision was also immune
  • noting that the dispatcher followed a policy the city adopted in an intergovernmental agreement, the latter being,a decision that both parties conceded was absolutely immune
  • noting that the dispatcher followed a policy the city adopted in an intergovernmental agreement, the latter being a decision that both parties conceded was absolutely immune
  • holding immune under § 12-820.01 an administrative decision that “involved weighing risks and gains, concerned the distribution of assets, and required consulting the city’s subject matter experts”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McGregor, Berch, Ryan, Hurwitz, Bales

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.