Myers v. Celotex Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the judge did not abuse his discretion, but applied an incorrect standard
• holding that the trial judge’s bifurcation of the trial into stages was proper because it served the two components of Rule 2-503(b): convenience and to avoid prejudice
• error for court to exclude “product identification” evidence where such evidence had great probative value and no discernible prejudice
• discussing the applicability of Rule 2-503(b)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).