Myers v. Arnold

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding exclusion of new matter on redirect proper where the proffered matter “was of marginal relevance” and redundant of other witnesses’ testimony
• holding exclusion of new matter on redirect proper where the proffered matter \was of marginal relevance\ and redundant of other witnesses' testimony
• suggesting that restoration cost rule does not apply to property held for business use
• “The law of torts attempts primarily to restore the injured party to as good a position as he held prior to the tort.”
• diminution in market value measure of damages “may be painfully inadequate . . . [to] protect plaintiffs’ legitimate interest in the use and enjoyment of their property”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).