Myers v. Alutiiq International Solutions, LLC

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that D.C. case law suggests that a plaintiff may be able assert claims for wrongful termination against individual employees
• dismihsesing promissory estoppel claim because he failed to allege that “he was promised that would be subject to progressive disciplinary policy”
• allowing a promissory estoppel claim to go forward against individual employees where there may have been a question as to “the terms and conditions” of their individual employment that “will inform the application of the agency principles”
• “5 U.S.C. § 2302 reflects a clear public policy of encouraging government employees to come forward and report possible problems in federal programs.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).