Skip to main content
· 10/13/1989

Myco, Inc. v. Super Concrete Co., Inc.

Citations

  • 565 A.2d 293
  • 1989 D.C. App. LEXIS 205
  • 1989 WL 123017

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • categorizing implied indemnity into “active/passive” indemnity and indemnity based on an independent duty, also known as implied-in-fact indemnity
  • preventing an independent contractor from receiving indemnity from an employer, where allowing indemnity would contravene statute protecting employer against non-workers’ compensation liability by exposing the employer to liability to a third party sued by the employee
  • preventing an independent contractor from receiving indemnity from an employer, where allowing indemnity would contravene statute protecting employer against non-workers' compensation liability by exposing the employer to liability to a third party sued by the employee
  • \The employer's duty of proper use and care of the [manufacturer's product] extends solely to its employees.\
  • “The employer’s duty of proper use and care of the [manufacturer’s product] extends solely to its employees.”
  • “The triadic relationship between an employer, an injured or deceased employee, and a third[-] party is governed by the [Act] . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rogers, Terry, Gallagher

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.