· 10/13/1989
Myco, Inc. v. Super Concrete Co., Inc.
Citations
- 565 A.2d 293
- 1989 D.C. App. LEXIS 205
- 1989 WL 123017
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- categorizing implied indemnity into “active/passive” indemnity and indemnity based on an independent duty, also known as implied-in-fact indemnity
- preventing an independent contractor from receiving indemnity from an employer, where allowing indemnity would contravene statute protecting employer against non-workers’ compensation liability by exposing the employer to liability to a third party sued by the employee
- preventing an independent contractor from receiving indemnity from an employer, where allowing indemnity would contravene statute protecting employer against non-workers' compensation liability by exposing the employer to liability to a third party sued by the employee
- \The employer's duty of proper use and care of the [manufacturer's product] extends solely to its employees.\
- “The employer’s duty of proper use and care of the [manufacturer’s product] extends solely to its employees.”
- “The triadic relationship between an employer, an injured or deceased employee, and a third[-] party is governed by the [Act] . . .”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Rogers, Terry, Gallagher
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.