M.W.F. v. D.D.F.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• describing notice requirement as an “ ‘essential condition’ ” of § 49-51 action and holding that plaintiff, “[a]s the moving party . . . had the burden of establishing compliance with this statutory requirement”
• in action to discharge lien pursuant to General Statutes § 49-51, “[t]he service of [the] complaint does not satisfy [the] notice requirement which is a prerequisite to the commencement of a statutory action”
• connected case wherein Maine procedure noted

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).