Muzzarelli v. Muzzarelli

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that, where victim impact witness deviated from the approved statement, the appellant was required to object to preserve his claim of error
• holding that, where victim impact witness [J-89-2014] - 48 deviated from the approved statement, the appellant was required to object to preserve his claim of error
• holding statute permitting victim impact testimony during penalty phase of a capital murder prosecution to be constitutional
• holding statute permitting victim impact testimony during penalty phase of a capital murder prosecution to be constitutional
• reflecting that the defendant murdered four victims shortly after purchasing a “survival combat- type” knife that the defendant was “meticulous and purposeful in selecting”
• reflecting that the defendant murdered four victims shortly after purchasing a “survival combat- type” knife that the defendant was “meticulous and purposeful in selecting”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).