Mutuelle Generale Francaise Vie v. Life Assurance Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• striking complaint that included “extraneous material unrelated to its claims[,]. . . colloquialisms and parenthetical additions to its allegations”
• “[0]ne Supreme Court decision (Fidelity Union Trust Co. v. Field, 311 U.S. 169, 61 S.Ct. 176, 85 L.Ed. 109 (1940)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).