Mutual Wheel Co. v. Meaders

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that a movant may not advance “arguments that were previously available but not presented to the court”
• explaining, in response to defendant’s argument that “there must be a statistical basis for [a] sample [of deposition testimony] to be representative” that “the focus in Reich[ v. Southern New England Telecommunications Corp., 121 F.3d 58 (2d Cir. 1997

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).