Mutual Protective League v. Walker

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• giving “very little weight” to the opinions of 2 defendants’ expert who, among other things, misrepresented the WPATH 3 standard of care
• bringing Eighth Amendment claim based on denial of medical care for gender dysphoria
• “[WPATH’s standards of care] recognized as authoritative standards of care by the American Medical Association, the American Psychiatric Association, and the American Psychological Association.” (citations omitted)
• order 17 granting preliminary injunctive relief to inmate for denial of medical treatment for gender 18 dysphoria in violation of the Eighth Amendment where depositions of the parties had been 19 taken and expert witnesses had been retained and written reports for both sides

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).