Skip to main content
· 2/3/1988

Mutual Produce, Inc. v. Penn Central Transportation Co.

Citations

  • 119 F.R.D. 619
  • 1988 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1549
  • 1988 WL 14636

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • factual statements of non-party witnesses did not fall within scope of work product doctrine even though the statements were secured by defense counsel in anticipation of litigation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Tauro

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.