· 2/3/1988
Mutual Produce, Inc. v. Penn Central Transportation Co.
Citations
- 119 F.R.D. 619
- 1988 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1549
- 1988 WL 14636
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- factual statements of non-party witnesses did not fall within scope of work product doctrine even though the statements were secured by defense counsel in anticipation of litigation
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Tauro
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.