Mutual of Enumclaw Insurance v. Roberts

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding provisions in an insurance policy were not ambiguous; the Court thus did not use canons of construction to construe the policy
• “Where the policy language is clear and unambiguous ... coverage must be determined in accordance with the plain meaning of the words used.”
• adopting the “logical and consistent” interpretation of the contract

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).