· 10/26/1994
MUTUAL OF ENUMCLAW INSURANCE CO. v. Key
Citations
- 883 P.2d 875
- 131 Or. App. 130
- 1994 Ore. App. LEXIS 1550
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that similar insurance policy “unequivocally limit[ed] [the insured’s] liability to the single-limit coverage, less all sums received from the tortfeasor[]”
- “[a] single limit policy providing $300,000 of coverage is essentially a split-limit policy with limits of $300,000 per person and $300,000 per accident”
- \UIM coverage is intended to place a policy holder in the same position that the policy holder would have been in if the tortfeasor had had liability coverage equal to the amount of the UM/UIM coverage.\
- “UIM coverage is intended to place a policy holder in the same “position that the policy holder would have been in if the tortfeasor had had liability coverage equal to the amount of the UM/UIM coverage.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Rossman, P.J., and De Muniz and Leeson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.