Mutual Life Ins. v. Harris

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• iciting United States v. Swift & Co., 286 U.S. 106, 114, 76 L. Ed. 999, 52 S. Ct. 460 (1932); Root v. Woolworth, 150 U.S. 401, 410-11, 37 L. Ed. 1123, 14 S. Ct. 136 (1893)
• contracts of each bottler do not appear to be governed by the law of any one state
• \[C]ommon issues should be resolved in one class proceeding.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).