Skip to main content
· 2/19/1948

Mutual Ben. Health & Acc. Ass'n v. Dailey

Citations

  • 75 F. Supp. 832
  • 1948 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3024

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that the city was not liable because the plaintiff failed to plead sufficient facts demonstrating the existence of a relevant policy or custom
  • dismissing the claim against the city because the plaintiff failed to plead adequate facts demonstrating the existence of a policy or custom
  • dismissing the claim against the city because the plaintiff failed to plead adequate facts demonstrating the existence of a policy or custom
  • dismissing the claim against the city because the plaintiff failed to plead adequate facts demonstrating the existence of a policy or custom
  • dismissing the claim against the city because the plaintiff failed to plead adequate facts demonstrating the existence of a relevant policy or custom
  • dismissing the claim against the city because the plaintiff failed to plead adequate facts demonstrating the existence of a policy or custom

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sweeney

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.