Mutual Assurance Society v. Commissioner

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that McKean should have known there was a conflict involved in lending one client’s money to another client
• applying stan dard 4.32 for a single conflict violation involving entering into a business transaction with a client
• imposing reprimand where McKean lent one client’s money to another client without full disclosure and he acted “at least” negligently
• recognizing potential harm from possibility of creditor attachment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).