Muttalib v. the State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that judge’s remarks in the record as to why evidence did not support conviction for one charge made transparent his reasoning, which was inconsistent with his finding of guilt for another charge, thereby warranting reversal of the judgment of conviction as to that second charge
• holding that judge’s remarks in the record as to why evidence did not support conviction for one charge made transparent his reasoning, which was inconsistent with his finding of guilt for another charge, thereby warranting reversal of the judgement of conviction as to that second charge

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).