Skip to main content
· 6/26/2008

MUTO EX REL. MUTO v. Scott

Citations

  • 686 S.E.2d 1
  • 224 W. Va. 350
  • 2008 W. Va. LEXIS 57

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • upon identification of the John Doe defendants initially named in the complaint, the newly-named defendants were served with the amended complaint within 120 days of the filing of the original complaint
  • “‘Under the 1998 amendments to Rule 15(c)(3) of the West Virginia Rules of Civil Procedure, before a plaintiff may amend a complaint to add a new defendant, it must be established that the newly-added defendant (1) received notice of the original action and (2

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Maynard

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.