· 6/26/2008
MUTO EX REL. MUTO v. Scott
Citations
- 686 S.E.2d 1
- 224 W. Va. 350
- 2008 W. Va. LEXIS 57
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- upon identification of the John Doe defendants initially named in the complaint, the newly-named defendants were served with the amended complaint within 120 days of the filing of the original complaint
- “‘Under the 1998 amendments to Rule 15(c)(3) of the West Virginia Rules of Civil Procedure, before a plaintiff may amend a complaint to add a new defendant, it must be established that the newly-added defendant (1) received notice of the original action and (2
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Maynard
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.