Muth v. W. P. Lahey's, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that, although the plaintiff proceeded to go into the store’s backroom to look for shoes, it was undisputed that the store’s clerk had instructed her to do so and, as such, the plaintiff was still an invitee, not a mere licensee

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Buhalis v. Trinity Continuing Care Services
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 2012-05-29· cited 242×
• Hafner v. Hafner
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1952-08-15· cited 21×
• Grover v. Simons
  Michigan Supreme Court· 1955-06-06· cited 13×
• Uren v. Toth
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1966-11-22· cited 8×
• Dockham v. Marr
  Michigan Supreme Court· 1964-11-02· cited 4×
• Jones v. Daimlerchrysler Corp.
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 2010-01-07· cited 2×
• Auto-Owners Insurance v. Haskins
  Michigan Supreme Court· 1954-06-07· cited 1×

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Torma v. Montgomery Ward & Co.
  Michigan Supreme Court· 1953-04-13· cited 57×
• Wine v. Newcomb, Endicott & Co.
  Michigan Supreme Court· 1918-12-27· cited 26×
• Corey v. Hartel
  Michigan Supreme Court· 1921-12-21· cited 24×
• Ralph v. MacMarr Stores
  Montana Supreme Court· 1936-12-05· cited 16×
• Otto v. Hansen Wholesale Lumber Corp.
  Michigan Supreme Court· 1951-09-05· cited 9×
• Cochran v. Pinto
  Michigan Supreme Court· 1952-04-07· cited 7×
• McCrum v. Weil & Co.
  Michigan Supreme Court· 1900-12-04· cited 6×
• Kuhn v. King
  Michigan Supreme Court· 1951-03-01· cited 5×