District Court of Appeal of Florida· 12/2/2009
Mutchnik, Inc. Construction v. Dimmerman
Citations
- 23 So. 3d 809
- 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 18411
- 2009 WL 4282645
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that the trial court erred in basing its judgment on issue not raised in the pleadings
- concluding that the trial court erred in basing its judgment on issue not raised in the pleadings
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Gersten, Ramirez, Shepherd
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- ARKY, FREED v. Bowmar Instrument Corp.Supreme Court of Florida· 1988-12-22· cited 48×
- Pro-Art Dental Lab, Inc. v. V-Strategic Group, LLCSupreme Court of Florida· 2008-07-10· cited 48×
- Carroll & Associates, PA v. GalindoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-11-19· cited 24×
- In Re Estate of HatcherDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1983-10-25· cited 15×
- Braverman v. Van Bower, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-07-23· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.